ooh this is a good one haha.

technically no in the sense that one partakes of the Lord's supper in remembrance of the death and ascension of Christ, so as long as one truly believes one should be able to do so. however it is sth that is very impt to think abt, for it is written in romans 15 i believe that one should not eat (of the Lord's supper) if one is not sure about one's faith for whatsoever is not of faith is of sin. hence some churches would rather have the pp be baptised before partaking of it cause at least baptism is a public affirmation of faith and makes it more possible that one has truly considered this qn. i think my church would be disapproving of this, but at least i arrive at their conclusion that it would be more prudent to partake only after baptism, aye?

that aside will be back on the 1st of july...exams till end may then rotting ard for a while haha.

here's an interesting topic.

Is baptism necessary for us to partake of the Lord's Supper?

yeah thanks. yes this is kinda delayed....school break (ie study break) has just started, and today we had part of the ultimate frisbee regionals....tomorrow is the other instalment. unfortunately i had twisted my other ankle on wednesday during practice, but i still palyed today, with the unfortunate result that i am hobbling around now, and obviously cannot play tomorrow. that aside ultimate frisbee is great fun haha. pray that all of you would have a blessed Easter and God bless!